About this dashboard
What we do
Who we are
How to contact us
Question
How do Austrian households make ends meet?
To begin with, let us take a look at the specialist terms we will be using throughout the dashboard:
Terms revolving around income
Net household income = combined annual net income of all members of a household
Net household income includes:
**For income from real estate property and private businesses, we assume gross values to be equal to net values, since there are no net values in the HFCS.*
Decile = one of the values of a variable that divides the frequency distribution of the variable into 10 equal groups, so that each group represents 1/10 of the total population
Equivalized net household income = net household income per consumption unit
Terms revolving around vulnerability
At-risk-of-poverty households = households with a net income of less than 60% of the median equivalized net household income
Debt-to-income (DTI) ratio = sum of debt divided by total household income (gross, annual)
Debt-to-asset (DTA) ratio = sum of debt divided by total household assets
Main background facts for Austria
For detailed information on the methodology, please refer for the Austrian HFCS to the methodological notes and the first results and for the Eurosystem HFCS to the methodological report and the results report.
Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.
The chart shows the mean net household income per year by income decile. For each decile, the mean net household income is broken down by types of income. Within each decile, one square represents EUR 100.
In the lowest decile, the mean net household income is about EUR 10,000. In the highest decile, it is close to EUR 100,000.
You can see that income from labor increases with each income decile. However, income from assets only accounts for a substantial part of household income in the highest decile.
Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.
The map shows the number of months a median household would be able to compensate for potential income losses by drawing on its liquid assets. Liquid assets include savings in sight and savings accounts as well as bonds, mutual funds and stocks.
You can see that a median household in Tyrol would be able to make ends meet for more than half a year if it lost its income. In Styria, a median household could only stay afloat for about 3 months.
If you hover over the provinces, you will see the share of potentially financially vulnerable households according to standard thresholds (DTI ratio ≥ 3 and DTA ratio ≥ 0.75).
Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.
The chart shows equivalized income as a share of the median equivalized income for different households. A ratio of 1 means that a household has an equivalized income which corresponds to the median income. If a household has an equivalized income of less than 60% of the median income (ratio of 0.6, indicated by the orange line), it is at risk of poverty.
You can see that single-parent households are more likely to be financially vulnerable than other household types, since quite a few households can be found left of the orange line (ratio of below 0.6).
You can also see that 2-adult households without children have relatively high levels of income (ratio of well above 0.6).
Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.
The bar chart shows, for 4 income groups, the share of households who reported that their expenditures had exceeded their income in the last 12 months. Moreover, it indicates how many of these households were able to borrow EUR 5,000 from friends or family in an emergency.
You can see that 20% of households with an income of less than 60% of the median income (at risk of poverty) got into financial difficulties. Two thirds of them said that they were not able to borrow EUR 5,000 from friends and family.
In the U.S., 40% of all households get into financial difficulties when faced with an unexpected expense of $ 400 (see FED 2019).
Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.
The chart shows how households dealt with the fact that their expenditures had surpassed their income in the last 12 months.
You can see that households who were at risk of poverty asked friends and family for help or used their savings. Higher-income households were mostly able to solely rely on their savings.
The share of households who left bills unpaid was highest for households at risk of poverty. By contrast, households with incomes above twice the median income were more likely to use credit cards or overdraw their sight accounts.
Source: HFCS Austria 2017, OeNB.
The chart shows the joint distribution of Austrian households’ net wealth, net income and consumption. The third dimension shows the (kernel) estimates for mean expenditures on consumption for each combination of income and net wealth.
The distribution of consumption is more equal than that of income or net wealth. In Austria, households with low income and low net wealth spend about EUR 600 on goods and services according to the HFCS. High-income and high-net-wealth households, on the other hand, spend about EUR 2,200 on average.
Note that several problems may occur when discussing the joint distribution of wealth, income and consumption (see Lindner and Schürz 2019).